Ghost Guerrero needs to be more lucid
against Katsidis
Mark E. Ortega
Leave-it-in-the-ring.com
April 4, 2011
He hasn't lost in almost five years,
has claimed world titles three times in two different weight classes,
has fought on HBO in three of his last four and, at 28 years old, he
should be hitting his physical prime. With credentials like those,
one must assume the fighter in question is a pound-for-pound entrant
that the casual fan is likely aware of.
Unfortunately, the fighter in
discussion is Robert “The Ghost” Guerrero, who on April 9th
will meet the always tough Michael Katsidis for the vacant interim
WBA and WBO lightweight titles on the undercard of Erik Morales'
return to Las Vegas against Marcos Maidana on HBO-PPV. Yes, its a
vacant interim unification bout.
Apart from a loss to Orlando Salido in
November of 2006 that was later overturned to a no contest when
Salido tested positive for steroids, Guerrero has only suffered one
defeat; a twelve round split decision at the hands of trial horse
Gamaliel Diaz when the young fighter from Gilroy, California was on
his way up the ladder. Guerrero avenged that loss six months later
close to home in the Bay Area's Oracle Arena in Oakland, California
when he stopped Diaz with a single brutal shot to the liver in the
sixth round, though Guerrero struggled a bit prior to getting there.
Despite going 9-0 with one no decision
since the Salido letdown, Guerrero [28-1-1, 18 KOs] is still looking
for a career defining victory despite having claimed a world
championship in two different weight classes.
In Katsidis [27-3, 22 KOs], Guerrero
has found an opponent that will likely step up his watchability
factor by at least ten as the Australian has hardly been in a dull
fight over the course of his career. If there was ever an opportunity
to remind the hardcore boxing fan that he is a fighter that demands
respect, this is it. Guerrero promoter Golden Boy Promotions has done
all they can in moving Guerrero into his current spot, featuring him
on HBO programming four times since joining forces.
Guerrero has partially himself to blame
for his lack of notoriety amongst boxing's casual fans. In fights
against Malcolm Klassen and Joel Casamayor, he looked far from
spectacular.
The Casamayor fight was particularly
troubling. On the undercard of the rematch between Juan Manuel
Marquez and Juan Diaz last July, Guerrero had an opportunity to once
and for all finish off one of the sport's active legends. At nearly
forty years old, Casamayor was beyond what many would consider shot
and had looked terrible against a journeyman level opponent in his
most recent prior bout.
Guerrero dropped Casamayor in the
second round but failed to put his foot on the gas. It was a terrible
fight to watch and he seemed hesitant to press against a guy that had
no pop and no desire to throw punches but was ripe for the taking.
Guerrero did the opposite of seizing the opportunity to score a
defining win and kept Casamayor in the fight to the point that the
39-year old Cuban even dropped Robert in the tenth.
Guerrero can't fully be to blame for
his current standing, though. He has been the victim of misfortune
just as much as his own enemy. His best recent performance came in
his last fight against fellow Northern Californian Vicente Escobedo,
where Guerrero pretty much shutout the former Olympian. The bout was
televised on HBO where it belonged, but inexplicably was featured on
a card that took place in Newark, New Jersey. If promoted right, the
bout could have been big for the region local to both fighters and
may have drummed up some additional press for one of the Bay's three
current world champions [Andre Ward, Nonito Donaire Jr. being the
other two].
Guerrero was also a victim of bad
circumstance the first time he graced HBO's airwaves following the
signing with Golden Boy. They gave Guerrero the spotlight by hosting
a Boxing After Dark tripleheader in March of 2009 by putting it in
San Jose, California, which is just minutes away from his hometown of
Gilroy. The card also featured two fellow blue chippers that Golden
Boy was looking to build in James Kirkland and Victor Ortiz, but it
was Guerrero's bout that was perceived as the most competitive as it
came against virtual unknown Indonesian Daud Yordan.
The fight looked like it was going to
be a good one as Yordan showed some definite skill, but a cut in the
second round above one of Guerrero's eyes forced a no decision and an
early stoppage, much to the fighter's local support's chagrin.
On April 9th, it could very
well be his opponent's face that dictates the result of this fight.
Katsidis is a well documented bleeder and even suffered a cut in
preparation for this bout. A cut bad enough that Katsidis' team
seemed intent on keeping the severity of it in limbo from the media
on a conference call early last week.
Guerrero also has an opponent that will
stand in front of him and will once and for all prove if he is worth
watching from an excitement standpoint for the remainder of his
career. If you can't make a good fight with Michael Katsidis, then
you're just not an exciting fighter, plain and simple. He will also
test Guerrero's resolve in that he is the first real lightweight he
will step in the ring against since making the move to 135
permanently last April.
The bout promises to be the most
competitive of the pay-per-view as the main event is being built on
the novelty of an elderly Erik Morales fighting a killer at 140
pounds in Marcos Maidana. Many don't figure that one to be
competitive, much the same way the James Kirkland bout against
Nobuhiro Ishida doesn't figure to be. The other televised bout, a
welterweight bout between Paulie Malignaggi and Jose Miguel Cotto may
be slightly more competitive but definitely will feature the most
lull in action on the card.
So the spotlight once again will shine
on Robert Guerrero as he has an opportunity to steal the show this
Saturday. For the sake of his career, he better be more lucid and
less transparent against Katsidis. Will he finally carpe diem? For
the sake of landing a big fight in the future, he sure better.
No comments:
Post a Comment